Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2015
Diaphragm Pacing without Tracheostomy in Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome Patients.
Clinical StudyСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Diep Bonnie, Wang Annie, Kun Sheila, McComb J Gordon, Shaul Donald B, Shin Cathy E, Keens Thomas G, Perez Iris A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is a rare disorder affecting central control of breathing. Thus, patients require lifelong assisted ventilation. Diaphragm pacing (DP) may permit decannulation in those who are ventilator dependent only during sleep.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with CCHS can be successfully ventilated by DP without tracheostomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 18 CCHS patients (mean age 19.5 ± 10.1 years; 44% female) who were ventilated by DP only during sleep.
RESULTS: Prior to diaphragm pacer implantation surgery, 14 CCHS patients had been using home portable positive pressure ventilation (PPV) via tracheostomy, 1 had been on PPV via endotracheal tube, and 3 had been using noninvasive PPV (NPPV). Of the patients with tracheostomy prior to DP (n = 15), 11 (73%) were decannulated and ventilated successfully by DP without tracheostomy. Of all the patients reviewed (n = 18), 13 (72%) were successfully ventilated by DP without tracheostomy. Obesity prevented successful DP without tracheostomy in 1 patient, and upper airway obstruction prevented success in another patient. Snoring and/or obstructive apneas were present in some patients, but they were improved by diaphragm pacer changes, adenotonsillectomy, and/or use of nasal steroids.
CONCLUSIONS: DP without tracheostomy can be successfully achieved in patients with CCHS. Snoring and obstructive apneas, when present, can be managed by diaphragm pacer changes and medical therapies. Obesity can pose a challenge to successful DP.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with CCHS can be successfully ventilated by DP without tracheostomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 18 CCHS patients (mean age 19.5 ± 10.1 years; 44% female) who were ventilated by DP only during sleep.
RESULTS: Prior to diaphragm pacer implantation surgery, 14 CCHS patients had been using home portable positive pressure ventilation (PPV) via tracheostomy, 1 had been on PPV via endotracheal tube, and 3 had been using noninvasive PPV (NPPV). Of the patients with tracheostomy prior to DP (n = 15), 11 (73%) were decannulated and ventilated successfully by DP without tracheostomy. Of all the patients reviewed (n = 18), 13 (72%) were successfully ventilated by DP without tracheostomy. Obesity prevented successful DP without tracheostomy in 1 patient, and upper airway obstruction prevented success in another patient. Snoring and/or obstructive apneas were present in some patients, but they were improved by diaphragm pacer changes, adenotonsillectomy, and/or use of nasal steroids.
CONCLUSIONS: DP without tracheostomy can be successfully achieved in patients with CCHS. Snoring and obstructive apneas, when present, can be managed by diaphragm pacer changes and medical therapies. Obesity can pose a challenge to successful DP.