MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac402

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal · 2022

Patient selection for long-term secondary prevention with ticagrelor: insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54.

Bonaca Marc P, Im KyungAh, Magnani Giulia, Bansilal Sameer, Dellborg Mikael, Storey Robert F, Bhatt Deepak L, Steg P Gabriel, Cohen Marc, Johanson Per, Braunwald Eugene, Sabatine Marc S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: In patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) on aspirin, the addition of ticagrelor reduces ischaemic risk but increases bleeding risk. The simultaneous assessment of baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk may assist clinicians in selecting patients who are most likely to have a favourable risk/benefit profile with long-term ticagrelor.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

PEGASUS-TIMI 54 randomized 21 162 prior MI patients, 13 956 of which to the approved 60 mg dose or placebo and who had all necessary data. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke, and the primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding; differences in Kaplan-Meier event rates at 3 years are presented. Post-hoc subgroups based on predictors of bleeding and ischaemic risk were merged into a selection algorithm. Patients were divided into four groups: those with a bleeding predictor (n = 2721, 19%) and then those without a bleeding predictor and either 0-1 ischaemic risk factor (IRF; n = 3004, 22%), 2 IRF (n = 4903, 35%), or ≥3 IRF (n = 3328, 24%). In patients at high bleeding risk, ticagrelor increased bleeding [absolute risk difference (ARD) +2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6, 3.9] and did not reduce the primary efficacy endpoint (ARD +0.08%, 95% CI -2.4 to 2.5). In patients at low bleeding risk, the ARDs in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor were -0.5% (-2.2, 1.3), -1.5% (-3.1, 0.02), and -2.6% (-5.0, -0.24, P = 0.03) in those with ≤1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively (P = 0.076 for trend across groups). There were significant trends for greater absolute risk reductions for cardiovascular death (P-trend 0.018), all-cause mortality (P-trend 0.027), and net outcomes (P-trend 0.037) with ticagrelor across these risk groups.

CONCLUSION

In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of patients with prior MI, long-term ticagrelor therapy appears to be best suited for those with prior MI with multiple IRFs at low bleeding risk.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01225562 ClinicalTrials.gov.

Для цитирования: Bonaca Marc P, Im KyungAh, Magnani Giulia, Bansilal Sameer, Dellborg Mikael, Storey Robert F, Bhatt Deepak L, Steg P Gabriel, Cohen Marc, Johanson Per, Braunwald Eugene, Sabatine Marc S. Patient selection for long-term secondary prevention with ticagrelor: insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54.. European heart journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac402.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.