MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of adolescence · 2018

Associations between friend conflict and affective states in the daily lives of adolescents.

Vannucci Anna, Ohannessian Christine McCauley, Flannery Kaitlin M, De Los Reyes Andres, Liu Songqi

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study examined the associations between friend conflict, defined as arguments with friends, and affective states using a daily diary design in a community sample of adolescents. Participants were 100 U.S. adolescents (13-17 years; 40% girls; 79% white). Adolescents completed an online survey on 14 consecutive evenings. Adolescents reported significantly higher anger/hostility, confusion, and tension/anxiety and less friendliness on days during which they experienced friend conflict relative to no-conflict days. However, no same-day associations for depressed affect, fatigue, or vigor were found. Adolescents experiencing friend conflict reported increased next-day anger/hostility, depressed affect, and tension/anxiety, but not other affective states. Higher levels of anger/hostility and depressed affect predicted an increased likelihood of next-day friend conflict. Conversely, higher levels of friendliness and vigor predicted a decreased likelihood of next-day friend conflict. These findings suggest that directional relationships between adolescents' friend conflicts and their affective states vary by affective domain.

Для цитирования: Vannucci Anna, Ohannessian Christine McCauley, Flannery Kaitlin M, De Los Reyes Andres, Liu Songqi. Associations between friend conflict and affective states in the daily lives of adolescents.. Journal of adolescence. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.