MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001

Медицинская библиотека · Behavior therapy · 2017

Modification of Hostile Interpretation Bias in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Smith Hillary L, Dillon Kirsten H, Cougle Jesse R

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Interpretation Bias Modification (IBM) is gaining attention in the literature as an intervention that alters cognitive biases and reduces associated symptoms. Forty, primarily college-aged, non-treatment-seeking adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomly assigned to receive either IBM targeting hostile interpretation bias (IBM-H) or a healthy video control (HVC) condition. Compared to those in HVC, participants in IBM-H reported more benign interpretations and fewer hostile interpretations at posttreatment. No difference in depressive interpretation bias was found between groups at posttreatment. IBM-H led to improved anger control at posttreatment and follow-up compared to HVC, though no effects of condition were found on trait anger or depressive symptoms. The IBM-H group perceived their treatment as less credible than the HVC group. For individuals with high expectancy of treatment success, IBM-H led to lower posttreatment depressive symptoms compared to HVC, while findings trended in the opposite direction for those with low expectancy of success. Overall, these preliminary findings point to boundary conditions for the efficacy of IBM protocols for anger and depression and potential improvements to be made to future IBM protocols.

Для цитирования: Smith Hillary L, Dillon Kirsten H, Cougle Jesse R. Modification of Hostile Interpretation Bias in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Behavior therapy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.