MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000250846.12958.05

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of plastic surgery · 2007

History of craniosynostosis surgery and the evolution of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques: the University of Florida experience.

Clayman Mark A, Murad Gregory J, Steele Mathew H, Seagle M Brent, Pincus David W

Историческая статьяСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Craniosynostosis is the premature and abnormal fusion of 1 of the 6 suture lines that form the living skull and can occur as part of a syndrome or as an isolated defect (nonsyndromic). The first reported surgical procedure for correction of craniosynostosis was performed in 1890 by Lannelongue who advocated releasing, but not resecting, the fused suture. Craniofacial surgery has developed its own identity in the last 3 decades, with the Frenchman Tessier seen as the founding father. There have been many new developments such as distraction osteogenesis, biodegradable miniplate fixation, and the development of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Through the pioneering work of Jimenez and Barone, minimally invasive approaches to the surgical correction of craniosynostosis are now gaining wider acceptance. Here the authors review the history of craniosynostosis, the current literature and technique for endoscopic repair of craniosynostosis, as well as their own experience at the University of Florida, with minimally invasive endoscope-assisted techniques.

Для цитирования: Clayman Mark A, Murad Gregory J, Steele Mathew H, Seagle M Brent, Pincus David W. History of craniosynostosis surgery and the evolution of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques: the University of Florida experience.. Annals of plastic surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000250846.12958.05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.