MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2196/73451

Медицинская библиотека · JMIR formative research · 2025

Health Care Providers' Perspectives of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Pediatric Sepsis in Bangladesh: Qualitative Study.

Shaima Shamsun N, Genisca Alicia E, Faruk Md Tanveer, Uddin Md Fakhar, Saha Akash, Sultana Nadia, Kadakia Nidhi, Gainey Monique, Kim Elleen, Shaw Kikuyo, Afroze Farzana, Chepngeno Joan, Jindal Atin, Chowdhury Sifat A, Chisti Md Jobayer, Levine Adam C, Garbern Stephanie C

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition resulting from a dysregulated immune response to infection, disproportionately affects children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Children with sepsis in LMICs face high mortality rates, with early detection and clinical monitoring posing significant challenges to effective management. There is great potential for digital technologies, such as wearable biosensor devices and mobile health (mHealth) clinical decision support (CDS) tools, together referred to as clinical decision support systems (CDSSs), to enable closer monitoring and more prompt recognition of children at risk of advanced sepsis and death. However, little is known about the perceptions of health care providers (HCPs) regarding the introduction of new digital health tools for pediatric sepsis care in LMICs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess HCPs' understanding, perceptions, and recommendations regarding the design and implementation of digital CDSSs for pediatric sepsis care in Bangladesh.

METHODS

Between February and May 2024, 18 individual semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with HCPs (nurses and physicians) at 3 urban hospitals in Bangladesh. The data were transcribed, translated from Bangla to English, and analyzed using a framework matrix analysis approach. Participants were asked about familiarity with digital health tools, feedback on CDSS design, perceptions of the system's utility, and barriers and facilitators to use of similar tools in clinical settings in Bangladesh.

RESULTS

Participants reported overall positive perceptions toward the potential implementation of a CDSS for pediatric sepsis care in Bangladesh. Some key priorities for the design of a CDSS were durability, reusability, cost considerations, reliability, and accuracy. Clinicians desired the CDS tool to also have customizable alarm parameters and include additional functions such as glucose monitoring. Many favored audio (ringtone) or visual (light) alarms to alert about changes in captured vital signs. HCPs believed that a CDSS could enhance patient care by allowing greater staff capacity to monitor patients, reducing management time, and aiding in faster clinical decision-making, with some suggesting it could lower mortality rates. Concerns regarding implementation included internet availability, affordability of the wearable devices, and trust in the CDSS outputs compared to expert clinician judgement.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study highlight HCPs' perceptions toward the potential of wearable biosensor devices and CDS tools (CDSSs) for improving pediatric sepsis outcomes in LMICs and highlight the need to address implementation challenges to ensure the effective integration of CDSSs into health care systems.

Для цитирования: Shaima Shamsun N, Genisca Alicia E, Faruk Md Tanveer, Uddin Md Fakhar, Saha Akash, Sultana Nadia, Kadakia Nidhi, Gainey Monique, Kim Elleen, Shaw Kikuyo, Afroze Farzana, Chepngeno Joan, Jindal Atin, Chowdhury Sifat A, Chisti Md Jobayer, Levine Adam C, Garbern Stephanie C. Health Care Providers' Perspectives of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Pediatric Sepsis in Bangladesh: Qualitative Study.. JMIR formative research. 2025. DOI: 10.2196/73451.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.