MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.08.004

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric neurology · 2024

Adequacy of an In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management.

Sharon Danielle, Singh Elizabeth, Jaimes Camilo, Grant Ellen, Inder Terrie, El-Dib Mohamed

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aims to assess the added diagnostic utility and clinical value of a 3-Tesla neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging after obtaining a 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging within the neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

A cohort of 34 infants had an initial 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and repeat imaging within 14 days in a 3-Tesla scanner. All infants were admitted to the level III neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all images were interpreted by pediatric neuroradiologists.

RESULTS

For 31 infants (91%), the 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging showed similar or expected evolution of known findings found on 1 Tesla. For infants with change between the 1-Tesla and 3-Tesla imaging results, there was no clinical impact.

CONCLUSION

Images from 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging were sufficient for characterizing a wide range of neonatal brain injuries and abnormalities and repeated 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging did not yield further clinical benefit.

Для цитирования: Sharon Danielle, Singh Elizabeth, Jaimes Camilo, Grant Ellen, Inder Terrie, El-Dib Mohamed. Adequacy of an In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management.. Pediatric neurology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.08.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.