MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1015-9584(09)60084-1

Медицинская библиотека · Asian journal of surgery · 2006

Tubularized longitudinal island flap of the mucosa and skin on the dorsum of the penis in the treatment of hypospadias: experience from 176 cases.

Liem Nguyen T, Dung Le A, Tinh Nguyen D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report the result of the treatment of hypospadias using tubularized longitudinal island flap of the mucosa and skin on the dorsum of the penis.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 2003, 176 patients were operated on using this technique. Among them, 124 patients had penile hypospadias, 35 had the penoscrotal form, four had the scrotal form and three patients had the perineal form. After removing the whole chordee, a longitudinal pedicle island flap of mucosa and skin was created. The flap was transposed to the ventral side of the penis by the buttonhole manoeuvre, and anastomosed to the meatus. The flap was tubularized creating a neourethra.

RESULTS

The length of urethral defect varied from 1.5 to 10 cm (mean, 3.5 cm). The single longitudinal flap was used in 171 patients. The combination of a longitudinal flap and a local flap was used in five patients. Fistulae occurred in 13 patients (7.4%). Torsion of the penile axis did not occur in any patient. All children voided with a single straight urinary stream, and had a normal appearance of the meatus.

CONCLUSION

The technique has a low fistula occurrence rate and a good cosmetic result.

Для цитирования: Liem Nguyen T, Dung Le A, Tinh Nguyen D. Tubularized longitudinal island flap of the mucosa and skin on the dorsum of the penis in the treatment of hypospadias: experience from 176 cases.. Asian journal of surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/s1015-9584(09)60084-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.