A Comparison of Outcomes After Palatoplasty in Patients With Non-Syndromic Pierre Robin Sequence Versus Patients With Non-Syndromic Isolated Cleft Palate.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes of cleft palate repair in patients with non-syndromic Pierre Robin sequence (NS-PRS) versus those with non-syndromic isolated cleft palate (NS-ICP). Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) was defined as a diagnosis of the triad of microretrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate, and the severity of PRS was assessed based on the presence of respiratory and feeding problems. All patients underwent palatoplasty between January 2000 and December 2011. The authors examined age at palatoplasty, type of cleft palate, fistula rate, velopharyngeal (VP) function, nasal emission, hypernasality, and need for secondary speech surgery, in addition to PRS severity in the NS-PRS patients. A total of 15 NS-PRS patients and 40 NS-ICP patients were reviewed. The incidence of VP dysfunction, nasal emission, hypernasality, and secondary speech surgery was not significantly different between the NS-PRS patients and NS-ICP patients. Age at palatoplasty was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.012) but type of CP was not (P = 1.00). Only 2 NS-PRS patients were classified as category III (severe), and all of the NS-PRS patients who had VP insufficiency were classified as PRS severity category I (not severe). The findings of this study indicate that NS-PRS patients may not have worse outcomes than NS-ICP patients.