MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2310/7070.2005.5007

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of otolaryngology · 2006

Efficacy of a leukotriene receptor antagonist in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Jiang Rong-San

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The study was designed as a randomized, 14-day treatment to compare the efficacy of zafirlukast, loratadine, and the combination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Rhinitis symptom scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry were used to evaluate the efficacy. The results showed that after a 14-day treatment period, patients in all treatment groups had a lower mean score for the symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal itching, and nasal obstruction (p < .05). Patients who took zafirlukast did not report a significant decrease in sneezing score (p = .1456), but the decrease in nasal obstruction score was more pronounced than in those who took loratadine or loratadine- pseudoephedrine (p = .014). However, the results of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry did not have a significant difference among the three groups (p > .05). The study concluded that zafirlukast seemed to have a better effect on relieving the symptom of nasal obstruction in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, but the actual mechanism needs further investigation.

Для цитирования: Jiang Rong-San. Efficacy of a leukotriene receptor antagonist in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.. The Journal of otolaryngology. 2006. DOI: 10.2310/7070.2005.5007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.