MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.11.017

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2015

Metastatic Cancer to the Larynx: A Case Report and Update.

Zenga Joseph, Mehrad Mitra, Bradley Joseph P

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe a case of colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the larynx and provide a review of the current literature.

METHODS

A case report with chart review was performed. A review of the current literature was performed by systematically searching PubMed, OVID, CINAHL Plus, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

In 1988, a comprehensive literature review identified melanoma as the most common neoplasm to exhibit laryngeal involvement. Since that study, 41 subsequent cases have been reported, and among these, colorectal adenocarcinoma was the most frequent distant primary (24%). In 25 (58%) cases, curative surgery was attempted, but only 4 patients remained disease-free at last follow up. We report the history of a 52-year-old man who presented with rectal adenocarcinoma metastatic to his larynx 4 years after definitive treatment of the primary site.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a laryngeal mass and a history of colorectal cancer, or those at high risk of having an occult colorectal primary, metastatic spread to the larynx must always be considered. Although secondary laryngeal metastasis portends a poor prognosis, for the select patient, surgical intervention can provide long-term disease control.

Для цитирования: Zenga Joseph, Mehrad Mitra, Bradley Joseph P. Metastatic Cancer to the Larynx: A Case Report and Update.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.11.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.