Pediatric emergency care · 2004
Relevance of type of catheters for central venous pressure measurement.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santelices Samuel, Sullivan Kevin J, Kissoon Niranjan, Duckworth Laurie J, Murphy Suzanne P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare simultaneous central venous pressure measurements from rigid polyurethane and soft tunneled silicone elastomere catheters.
HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in central venous pressure readings between polyurethane and silastic catheters.
SETTING: Bone Marrow Transplant Unit in a tertiary care children's hospital.
PATIENTS: Five children undergoing bone marrow transplantation with preexisting polyurethane and silastic catheters.
METHODS: Simultaneous central venous pressure readings were obtained by 2 observers blinded to the other readings and to the type of catheter. Readings were done in triplicate (total of 690 readings). Each triplicate was averaged to 1 data point yielding 115 paired central venous pressure measurements.
RESULTS: No significant difference was demonstrated between polyurethane and silicone catheters (-1 +/- 3 cm H20). Using Bland and Altman method revealed no significant bias (mean = -1 cm H2O) and acceptable agreement between catheter types.
CONCLUSION: Silicone and polyurethane catheters yield similar values of central venous pressures. Permanently implanted silicone elastomere catheters can be used to measure central venous pressure in the emergency setting.
HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in central venous pressure readings between polyurethane and silastic catheters.
SETTING: Bone Marrow Transplant Unit in a tertiary care children's hospital.
PATIENTS: Five children undergoing bone marrow transplantation with preexisting polyurethane and silastic catheters.
METHODS: Simultaneous central venous pressure readings were obtained by 2 observers blinded to the other readings and to the type of catheter. Readings were done in triplicate (total of 690 readings). Each triplicate was averaged to 1 data point yielding 115 paired central venous pressure measurements.
RESULTS: No significant difference was demonstrated between polyurethane and silicone catheters (-1 +/- 3 cm H20). Using Bland and Altman method revealed no significant bias (mean = -1 cm H2O) and acceptable agreement between catheter types.
CONCLUSION: Silicone and polyurethane catheters yield similar values of central venous pressures. Permanently implanted silicone elastomere catheters can be used to measure central venous pressure in the emergency setting.