MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.105

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2011

Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance urography for evaluation of contralateral kidney in patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney disease.

Kalisvaart Jonathan, Bootwala Yasmin, Poonawala Husain, Elmore James, Kirsch Andrew, Scherz Hal, Jones Richard, Grattan-Smith J Damien, Smith Edwin

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The contralateral kidney is abnormal in up to 25% of patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney. Traditionally, anatomical and functional evaluation of the contralateral kidney has been performed with ultrasound and dimercapto-succinic acid renal scintigraphy, as indicated. Recently magnetic resonance urography has been used to evaluate renal anatomy and function in other urological abnormalities. We compared the results of magnetic resonance urography and ultrasound for evaluating the contralateral kidney in patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney and we describe the range of findings detected.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney who underwent magnetic resonance urography were identified. Anatomical findings on magnetic resonance urography were analyzed and compared to those on renal ultrasound. Additional functional information derived from magnetic resonance urography was also recorded.

RESULTS

We retrospectively identified 58 patients with a unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney who had undergone magnetic resonance urography, of whom 54 also underwent ultrasound. Of the patients 19 (32.8%) had a contralateral abnormality. A discrepancy between magnetic resonance urography and ultrasound was seen in 9 patients (16.7%). Of these patients only 1 had a completely normal contralateral kidney by ultrasound on retrospective review. The incidence and range of parenchymal abnormalities was wider than previously reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral abnormalities in children with multicystic dysplastic kidney are common and more definitively evaluated with magnetic resonance urography vs ultrasound. Renal ultrasound remains the most appropriate modality for the initial evaluation of children with multicystic dysplastic kidney, and magnetic resonance urography is recommended when a functional study is required either to confirm the diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney or to evaluate suspected abnormalities of the contralateral kidney.

Для цитирования: Kalisvaart Jonathan, Bootwala Yasmin, Poonawala Husain, Elmore James, Kirsch Andrew, Scherz Hal, Jones Richard, Grattan-Smith J Damien, Smith Edwin. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance urography for evaluation of contralateral kidney in patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney disease.. The Journal of urology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.