The Journal of hand surgery · 2008
Dynamic electromyographic evaluation of adolescents with traumatic cervical injury after biceps to triceps transfer: the role of phasic contraction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hutchinson David, Kozin Scott H, Mayer Nathaniel, Mulcahey M J, Duffy Theresa, Gaughan John P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To characterize the EMG firing pattern of the biceps after transfer to the triceps.
METHODS: Seven subjects (12 arms), 18.0 +/- 1.7 years old, consented to fine wire EMG assessment of the biceps, averaging 23.0 +/- 10.0 months (range: 9 to 45 months) after transfer. Subjects were tested under 3 conditions: (1) single flexion and extension, (2) self-selected alternating elbow flexion and extension, and (3) isometric flexion and extension. A strain gauge electrogoniometer measured elbow movement. Using root-mean-squared values of biceps EMG, ratios of extension/flexion activity were calculated for each muscle. Conventional manual muscle testing grades were obtained before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Median manual muscle testing for elbow extension was 0 before surgery and 4- (range: 3- to 4) following surgery. For each of the 3 conditions tested, the biceps reversed its action to an elbow extensor (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the biceps, after transfer to the triceps in patients with C5 or C6 spinal cord injury, can be trained to activate preferentially during elbow extension, a reversal of its ordinary action as an elbow flexor.
METHODS: Seven subjects (12 arms), 18.0 +/- 1.7 years old, consented to fine wire EMG assessment of the biceps, averaging 23.0 +/- 10.0 months (range: 9 to 45 months) after transfer. Subjects were tested under 3 conditions: (1) single flexion and extension, (2) self-selected alternating elbow flexion and extension, and (3) isometric flexion and extension. A strain gauge electrogoniometer measured elbow movement. Using root-mean-squared values of biceps EMG, ratios of extension/flexion activity were calculated for each muscle. Conventional manual muscle testing grades were obtained before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Median manual muscle testing for elbow extension was 0 before surgery and 4- (range: 3- to 4) following surgery. For each of the 3 conditions tested, the biceps reversed its action to an elbow extensor (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the biceps, after transfer to the triceps in patients with C5 or C6 spinal cord injury, can be trained to activate preferentially during elbow extension, a reversal of its ordinary action as an elbow flexor.