MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05111.x

Медицинская библиотека · BJU international · 2004

Comparative study of dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis pedicle wrap for the tubularized incised plate in primary hypospadias repair.

Chatterjee Uday S, Mandal Manas K, Basu Supriyo, Das Ranjit, Majhi Tapas

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To report a prospective comparative study on using dartos fascia, i.e. subcutaneous tissue of penile skin and tunica vaginalis pedicled wrap (TVPW) from the parietal layer of the tunica vaginalis of the testis, for a one-stage tubularized incised-plate (TIP) repair for hypospadias.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Forty-nine patients (mean age 4.6 years, range 1-22) with hypospadias of different types (varying from coronal to penoscrotal) were repaired in one of three hospitals over 3 years. All patients were repaired using the TIP technique, with dartos fascia wrap used in 20 and TVPW in 29, without using a loupe or microscope during surgery. Urinary diversion and splinting were provided by a urethral catheter. The operative duration for both groups was similar at approximately 2 h.

RESULTS

In the dartos fascia group there were three (15%) fistulae, but there were none in the TVPW group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the dissection for TVPW seems to be cumbersome theoretically, it is not difficult. The combination of TIP and TVPW in primary repair may be a good alternative to other techniques.

Для цитирования: Chatterjee Uday S, Mandal Manas K, Basu Supriyo, Das Ranjit, Majhi Tapas. Comparative study of dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis pedicle wrap for the tubularized incised plate in primary hypospadias repair.. BJU international. 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05111.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.