Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
ChatGPT-4o in Pediatric Burn Care: Expert Review of Its Role in Initial Clinical Decision-Making.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boztas Asya Eylem, Genisol Incinur, Payza Ayse Demet, Okur Ozkan, Sencan Arzu
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and quality of responses generated by ChatGPT-4o to frequently asked questions (FAQs) posed by practicing physicians regarding the initial assessment of pediatric burn injuries, as assessed by pediatric burn specialists.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four FAQs about pediatric burn care were posed to ChatGPT-4o twice, 2 weeks apart, in a blinded manner by 4 experienced pediatric surgeons who work at a national tertiary referral burn center. Questions were divided into 5 subgroups; initial assessment and triage, fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic management, wound care and infection prevention, pain management and sedation, special situations and follow-up. The reliability of ChatGPT-4o's answers was evaluated utilizing the modified 5-point DISCERN tool (mDISCERN). The comprehensive quality of the answers was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS). Inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high-quality and reliable responses to questions. The median GQS was 4.75 (range: 3.50-5.00). The mDISCERN median score was 9.25 (range: 7.00-10.00), reflecting strong informational reliability. There was a very strong correlation between GQS and mDISCERN scores (r = 0.858, P < .001), indicating consistent alignment between content quality and reliability. Inter-rater reliability analysis showed excellent consistency for average scores (ICC = 0.87, P < .001), supporting the robustness of the reviewers' assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated itself to be a high-quality and reliable source of information for the initial evaluation of pediatric patients with burn injuries, providing substantial support for healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four FAQs about pediatric burn care were posed to ChatGPT-4o twice, 2 weeks apart, in a blinded manner by 4 experienced pediatric surgeons who work at a national tertiary referral burn center. Questions were divided into 5 subgroups; initial assessment and triage, fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic management, wound care and infection prevention, pain management and sedation, special situations and follow-up. The reliability of ChatGPT-4o's answers was evaluated utilizing the modified 5-point DISCERN tool (mDISCERN). The comprehensive quality of the answers was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS). Inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high-quality and reliable responses to questions. The median GQS was 4.75 (range: 3.50-5.00). The mDISCERN median score was 9.25 (range: 7.00-10.00), reflecting strong informational reliability. There was a very strong correlation between GQS and mDISCERN scores (r = 0.858, P < .001), indicating consistent alignment between content quality and reliability. Inter-rater reliability analysis showed excellent consistency for average scores (ICC = 0.87, P < .001), supporting the robustness of the reviewers' assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated itself to be a high-quality and reliable source of information for the initial evaluation of pediatric patients with burn injuries, providing substantial support for healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making.