Cutaneous and ocular toxicology · 2017
Trends in culprit drugs and clinical entities in cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Fang, Zhao Yu-Kun, Li Minyi, Zhu Zhe, Zhang Xingqi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Morbidity due to cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) is quite common. The specific culprit drugs change over time and clinicians must be kept informed with updated knowledge, thus preventing potential CADRs. This retrospective study is a survey of CADRs encountered in a hospital-based population in Southern China during three time intervals, from 1984 to 2015.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical records were review of 306 patients with CADRs who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2015. These data were compared with patients visiting our hospital during 1984-1994 and 2003-2010.
RESULTS: From 2011 to 2015, the most common CADRs were exanthematous reactions (40.8%) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN; 17.0%). There were eight cases (2.6%) of CADRs related to targeted therapy in oncology. In the 205 CADR cases that were due to single medications, the most common offending drugs were allopurinol (21.5%), cephalosporins (10.7%) and carbamazepine (10.2%). The percentages of CADR cases due to allopurinol, carbamazepine, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were significantly higher from 2011 to 2015 compared with 1984-1994 or 2003-2010. The rate of SJS/TEN occurrence was significantly higher in the two recent periods compared with 1984-1994.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in drug prescriptions are a major factor that affects the CADRs seen in clinical records. Newer drugs can be culpable for CADRs, and more CADRs are now documented with increased severity at clinical presentation. Reliable screening tests for specific drugs are urgently required to eliminate possible fatalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical records were review of 306 patients with CADRs who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2015. These data were compared with patients visiting our hospital during 1984-1994 and 2003-2010.
RESULTS: From 2011 to 2015, the most common CADRs were exanthematous reactions (40.8%) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN; 17.0%). There were eight cases (2.6%) of CADRs related to targeted therapy in oncology. In the 205 CADR cases that were due to single medications, the most common offending drugs were allopurinol (21.5%), cephalosporins (10.7%) and carbamazepine (10.2%). The percentages of CADR cases due to allopurinol, carbamazepine, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were significantly higher from 2011 to 2015 compared with 1984-1994 or 2003-2010. The rate of SJS/TEN occurrence was significantly higher in the two recent periods compared with 1984-1994.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in drug prescriptions are a major factor that affects the CADRs seen in clinical records. Newer drugs can be culpable for CADRs, and more CADRs are now documented with increased severity at clinical presentation. Reliable screening tests for specific drugs are urgently required to eliminate possible fatalities.