Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
Protecting tropical forests is more cost-effective for biodiversity and climate than restoration.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miranda Leonardo S, Thomson James R, Ferreira Joice, Gardner Toby A, Berenguer Erika, Lees Alexander C, Mac Nally Ralph, Aragão Luiz E O C, Brancalion Pedro H S, Ferraz Silvio F B, Garrett Rachael D, Molin Paulo G, Moura Nárgila G, Nunes Sâmia S, Parry Luke, Silveira Juliana M, Vieira Ima C G, Viana Cecilia, Barlow Jos
Аннотация
Halting deforestation and promoting restoration are at the core of strategies to confront the biodiversity and climate crises in tropical forests. Avoiding forest disturbances is also critically important but has received far less attention, and there is a lack of clarity about the relative cost-effectiveness of these three interventions. We compare the biodiversity and carbon benefits and costs associated with each intervention, comparing observed and counterfactual outcomes based on in-depth field assessments and high-resolution remote sensing in the Brazilian Amazon deforestation frontier. Avoidance interventions delivered the greatest benefits and were more cost-effective than restoration, with results being robust to a range of benefit and cost assumptions. However, combined interventions delivered the greatest gains and were essential to reverse biodiversity and carbon losses.