MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12903-025-06447-8

Медицинская библиотека · BMC oral health · 2025

Comparison of passive ultrasonic and sonically activated irrigation methods: an investigation based on PGE2, NO and IL-6 levels.

Ersahan Seyda, Ozcelik Fatih, Fındıkçı Sertan, Hepsenoglu Yelda Erdem, Degirmencioglu Duygu, Usta Aslı

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The effectiveness of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation(PUI) and Sonically Activated Irrigation(SAI) techniques was investigated in apical periodontitis(AP) patients based on changes in prostaglandin E2(PGE2), nitric oxide(NO), and interleukin-6(IL-6) levels. Sixty-six AP patients and thirty healthy controls were enrolled. Preoperative gingival crevicular fluid(preGCF) PGE2, NO and IL-6 levels were measured before treatment. After chemo-mechanical preparation, teeth were assigned into two groups according to final irrigation protocol[PUI(n:33) and SAI(n:33)]. The same markers were again measured 1 week after treatment(postGCF) and also 1st order most commonly seen bacteria(FMCB) typing was performed on microbial samples of the patients. PostGCF-PGE2 levels of the PUI group were lower than postGCF-PGE2 levels of the SAI group(p = 0.0335). Both postGCF-PE2 and IL-6 levels of the PUI group were significantly decreased after treatment(p < 0.0001), while only postGCF-PE2 levels decreased in the SAI group(p = 0.0316). The PUI system significantly reduced PGE2 and IL-6 levels by better controlling inflammation in the treatment of AP.

Для цитирования: Ersahan Seyda, Ozcelik Fatih, Fındıkçı Sertan, Hepsenoglu Yelda Erdem, Degirmencioglu Duygu, Usta Aslı. Comparison of passive ultrasonic and sonically activated irrigation methods: an investigation based on PGE2, NO and IL-6 levels.. BMC oral health. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-06447-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.