MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002

Медицинская библиотека · Magnetic resonance imaging · 2013

State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation.

Gordillo Nelly, Montseny Eduard, Sobrevilla Pilar

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Brain tumor segmentation consists of separating the different tumor tissues (solid or active tumor, edema, and necrosis) from normal brain tissues: gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In brain tumor studies, the existence of abnormal tissues may be easily detectable most of the time. However, accurate and reproducible segmentation and characterization of abnormalities are not straightforward. In the past, many researchers in the field of medical imaging and soft computing have made significant survey in the field of brain tumor segmentation. Both semiautomatic and fully automatic methods have been proposed. Clinical acceptance of segmentation techniques has depended on the simplicity of the segmentation, and the degree of user supervision. Interactive or semiautomatic methods are likely to remain dominant in practice for some time, especially in these applications where erroneous interpretations are unacceptable. This article presents an overview of the most relevant brain tumor segmentation methods, conducted after the acquisition of the image. Given the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging over other diagnostic imaging, this survey is focused on MRI brain tumor segmentation. Semiautomatic and fully automatic techniques are emphasized.

Для цитирования: Gordillo Nelly, Montseny Eduard, Sobrevilla Pilar. State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation.. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.