Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2017
Detection of ingested nitromethane and reliable creatinine assessment using multiple common analytical methods.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murphy Christine M, Devlin John J, Beuhler Michael C, Cheifetz Paul, Maynard Susan, Schwartz Michael D, Kacinko Sherri
Аннотация
AIM: Nitromethane, found in fuels used for short distance racing, model cars, and model airplanes, produces a falsely elevated serum creatinine with standard creatinine analysis via the Jaffé method. Erroneous creatinine elevation often triggers extensive testing, leads to inaccurate diagnoses, and delayed or inappropriate medical interventions. Multiple reports in the literature identify "enzymatic assays" as an alternative method to detect the true value of creatinine, but this ambiguity does not help providers translate what type of enzymatic assay testing can be done in real time to determine if there is indeed false elevation.
METHODS: We report seven cases of ingested nitromethane where creatinine was determined via Beckman Coulter® analyser using the Jaffé method, Vitros® analyser, or i-Stat® point-of-care testing. Nitromethane was detected and semi-quantified using a common clinical toxic alcohol analysis method, and quantified by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: When creatinine was determined using i-Stat® point-of-care testing or a Vitros® analyser, levels were within the normal range. Comparatively, all initial creatinine levels obtained via the Jaffé method were elevated. Nitromethane concentrations ranged from 42 to 310 μg/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: These cases demonstrate reliable assessment of creatinine through other enzymatic methods using a Vitros® analyser or i-STAT®. Additionally, nitromethane is detectable and quantifiable using routine alcohols gas chromatography analysis and by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
METHODS: We report seven cases of ingested nitromethane where creatinine was determined via Beckman Coulter® analyser using the Jaffé method, Vitros® analyser, or i-Stat® point-of-care testing. Nitromethane was detected and semi-quantified using a common clinical toxic alcohol analysis method, and quantified by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: When creatinine was determined using i-Stat® point-of-care testing or a Vitros® analyser, levels were within the normal range. Comparatively, all initial creatinine levels obtained via the Jaffé method were elevated. Nitromethane concentrations ranged from 42 to 310 μg/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: These cases demonstrate reliable assessment of creatinine through other enzymatic methods using a Vitros® analyser or i-STAT®. Additionally, nitromethane is detectable and quantifiable using routine alcohols gas chromatography analysis and by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.