DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111546
The impact of obstructive sleep apnea screening guidelines in a population-based, midwestern cohort of children with Down Syndrome.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
/
Background
The high rate of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Down Syndrome (DS) is well described in the literature. The impact of the 2011 screening guidelines has not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the 2011 screening guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a community cohort of children with Down Syndrome.
PATIENTS/
METHODS
This is a retrospective, observational study conducted on 85 individuals with DS born between 1995 and 2011 in a nine-county region of southeast Minnesota. The Rochester Epidemiological Project (REP) Database was used to identify these individuals.
RESULTS
/
Conclusions
Sixty-four percent of the patients with DS had OSA. Post guideline publication, the median age at OSA diagnosis was higher (5.9 years; p = 0.003) and polysomnography (PSG) was used more often to establish the diagnosis. Most children underwent first line therapy with adenotonsillectomy. There was a high degree of residual OSA after surgery (65%). There were trends post guideline publication towards increased PSG use and for consideration of additional therapy beyond adenotonsillectomy. The use of PSG before and after first line treatment for OSA in children with DS is needed due to the high rate of residual OSA. Unexpectedly, in our study, the age at OSA diagnosis was higher after guideline publication. Continued assessment of clinical impact and refinement of these guidelines will be of benefit to individuals with DS given the prevalence and longitudinal nature of OSA in this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.