Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2014
Device therapy for atrial septal defects in a multicenter cohort: acute outcomes and adverse events.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Said Howaida, Hegde Sanjeet, Foerster Susan, Hellenbrand William, Kreutzer Jacqueline, Trucco Sara M, Holzer Ralf, Burch Grant, Mirani Ajay, Nicolas Ramzi, Porras Diego, Bergersen Lisa, Moore John
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure devices were granted approval based on industry-sponsored, prospective, nonrandomized, single device studies, demonstrating acceptable efficacy and safety in selected patients. We sought to report community practice and outcomes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Procedure specific data was collected on cases considered for ASD closure in the congenital cardiac catheterization project on outcomes (C3PO) between February 1, 2007 and June 31, 2010. Eight centers contributed data during this time period. All adverse events (AE) were independently reviewed and classified by a five level severity scale. In 40 months (2/07-6/10), 653 of 688 ASDs were occluded with a single device using an AMPLATZER(®) Septal Occluder (ASO) in 566 (87%), GORE(®) HELEX(®) Septal Occluder (HSO) in 33 (5%), and a CardioSEAL(®) or STARFlex™ device (CSD) in 54 (8%). Most patients had an isolated ASD (93%). 85% were >2 years of age. The ASD median diameter was 12 mm [8,16] for ASO, with smaller diameters in HSO 8 mm [7,10] and CSD 8 mm [5,10] (P < 0.001). AE (n = 82) were recorded in 76 cases, 11.5% (95% CI 9.2%, 14.1%) and classified as high severity in 4.7% (95% CI 3.2%, 6.5%), with no mortality. A new conduction abnormality was detected during 15 cases and did not resolve in one. Transcatheter device retrieval was possible in 7 of 10 device embolizations. Device erosion occurred in 3 of 566, 0.5% (95% CI 0.1%, 1.5%), ASO implants.
CONCLUSION: Although device closure of ASDs is associated with low morbidity and rare mortality, ongoing assessment of device safety profiles are warranted, and registries offer opportunities to facilitate the required surveillance.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Procedure specific data was collected on cases considered for ASD closure in the congenital cardiac catheterization project on outcomes (C3PO) between February 1, 2007 and June 31, 2010. Eight centers contributed data during this time period. All adverse events (AE) were independently reviewed and classified by a five level severity scale. In 40 months (2/07-6/10), 653 of 688 ASDs were occluded with a single device using an AMPLATZER(®) Septal Occluder (ASO) in 566 (87%), GORE(®) HELEX(®) Septal Occluder (HSO) in 33 (5%), and a CardioSEAL(®) or STARFlex™ device (CSD) in 54 (8%). Most patients had an isolated ASD (93%). 85% were >2 years of age. The ASD median diameter was 12 mm [8,16] for ASO, with smaller diameters in HSO 8 mm [7,10] and CSD 8 mm [5,10] (P < 0.001). AE (n = 82) were recorded in 76 cases, 11.5% (95% CI 9.2%, 14.1%) and classified as high severity in 4.7% (95% CI 3.2%, 6.5%), with no mortality. A new conduction abnormality was detected during 15 cases and did not resolve in one. Transcatheter device retrieval was possible in 7 of 10 device embolizations. Device erosion occurred in 3 of 566, 0.5% (95% CI 0.1%, 1.5%), ASO implants.
CONCLUSION: Although device closure of ASDs is associated with low morbidity and rare mortality, ongoing assessment of device safety profiles are warranted, and registries offer opportunities to facilitate the required surveillance.