Clinical characteristics of and antibody response to spotted fever group rickettsial infections in South India: Case series and serological cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The clinical and serological characteristics of spotted fever group rickettsial (SFGR) infections in South Asia are poorly understood. We studied the clinical presentation and the IgM/IgG response in cases enrolled at two health care centres in South India.
METHOD: We enrolled 77 patients. Fifty-seven of these patients were recruited at a tertiary care centre, the remaining 20 at a community hospital (secondary care level). Diagnostic tests included IgM and IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction. Over a period of 1 year, 41 cases were followed up for repeated sero-analysis.
RESULTS
Median age was 9 years (range 1-79). A rash was present in 74% of cases (57/77). In cases aged <15 years, rash was present in 94% (44/47) vs. 43% (13/30) in cases aged ≥15 years. An eschar was found in two cases (3%). Severe infection or complications occurred in 10 cases (13%). These included central nervous system infection (6/77, 8%), kidney injury (3/77, 4%), shock (3/77, 4%), lung involvement (2/77, 3%) and peripheral gangrene (2/77, 3%). IgM antibody levels increased faster after fever onset than IgG antibodies, peaking at 50 and 60 days, respectively. After the peak, IgM and IgG levels showed a slow decline over one year with less than 50% of cases showing persistent IgG antibody levels.
CONCLUSION
Spotted fever group rickettsial infections in South India may be under-diagnosed, as many cases may not develop a rash. The proportion of cases developing severe infection seems lower than for scrub typhus in this region. IgG seroprevalence may substantially underestimate the proportion in a population with past SFGR infection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.