MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet · 2005

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) on nerve injury associated with anesthesia.

Sirinan Chomchaba, Akavipat Phuping, Srisawasdi Surirat, Tanudsintum Surasak, Weerawatganon Thewarug

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) database was used to identify the incidence, outcome and contributing factors of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia in Thai people.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 hospital in Thailand from February 1, 2003 to January 31, 2004. All patients underwent anaesthesia were monitored for nerve injuries during the first 24 hours. The details of nerve injuries were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia was 1.6 per 10,000 patients. Considering on spinal and regional anesthesia, the incidence was 5.2 per 10,000 patients. Lumbosacral roots comprised 65.4% of the injuries, the brachial plexus nerve 11.5%, and femoral nerve 7.7%. Contributing factors included type and duration of surgery and regional anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia in Thailand was 1.5 per 10,000 patients. The spinal anesthesia was predominantly associated with injury of lumbosacral root.

Для цитирования: Sirinan Chomchaba, Akavipat Phuping, Srisawasdi Surirat, Tanudsintum Surasak, Weerawatganon Thewarug. The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) on nerve injury associated with anesthesia.. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.