MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000006290

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2020

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Eustachian Tube in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Normal Controls.

Duman Suayip Burak, Bayrakdar Ibrahim Sevki, Yasa Yasin

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The authors compared the morphological features of the Eustachian tube (ET) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CL/P) and normal controls using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT images of 51 CL/P patients (28 males and 23 females, mean age: 18.5 ± 8.0 years) and a control group of 52 patients (22 males and 30 females, mean age: 25.23 ± 10.65 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The Eustachian tube angle (ETA), Eustachian tube length (EL), and auditory tube angle (ATA) were measured on CBCT images. The ETA, EL, and ATA in the CL/P and normal control groups were 30.4 ± 6.2 and 36.7 ± 7.5°; 24.7 ± 3.7 and 27.7 ± 4.3 mm; and 142.4 ± 7.8 and 136.3 ± 4.1°, respectively. All between-group differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). There were no significant between-gender differences in either group (all P > 0.05). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The morphological features of the ET, measured via multiplanar reconstruction CBCT, differed between CL/P patients and normal controls. CBCT can be used to evaluate ET morphological features.

Для цитирования: Duman Suayip Burak, Bayrakdar Ibrahim Sevki, Yasa Yasin. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Eustachian Tube in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Normal Controls.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000006290.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.