MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12659/aot.883461

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of transplantation · 2012

The utility of amylase and lipase as reliable predictive markers for functioning renal graft.

Yilmaz Ugur Eser, Yilmaz Nevin, Titiz Izzet, Basaranoglu Metin, Tarcin Orhan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of amylase and lipase as reliable predictive markers for functioning renal grafts, either short- or long-term.

MATERIAL/

METHODS

Serum amylase (Amyl), lipase, creatinine (Cr), creatinine clearance (Cr Cl) and 24-hr proteinuria (Prot) were studied in 190 kidney recipients. The correlation of these outcomes for each parameter was tested. Sensitivity and specificity of the variables were obtained in patients with graft failure (GF) and acute cellular rejection (ACR).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 66.7 month. Amyl and lipase were elevated 67% vs. 45% in GF (N=23); 60% vs. 44% in ACR (N=42) patients and were inversely correlated with Cr Cl (p>.05). Lipase was notably superior to amylase and creatinine; the specificity of lipase (Amyl, Cr) was 87% (59%, 28%). Increases in amylase were more predictive in the presence of mild or moderate kidney failure (33% and 52%, respectively). However, the highest intensity of lipase elevation (39%) was in advanced kidney failure (Cr Cl <30 ml/min).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum amylase and lipase should be used as markers monitoring graft function. For early detection of graft dysfunction, amylase seems to be superior to lipase.

Для цитирования: Yilmaz Ugur Eser, Yilmaz Nevin, Titiz Izzet, Basaranoglu Metin, Tarcin Orhan. The utility of amylase and lipase as reliable predictive markers for functioning renal graft.. Annals of transplantation. 2012. DOI: 10.12659/aot.883461.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.