DOI 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.03.041
Comparative Analysis of Thrombosis in ECPella Patients Between Bivalirudin versus Heparin Anticoagulation Strategies.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To review and compare the frequency of thrombus and adverse events in patients treated with heparin or bivalirudin systemic anticoagulation strategies supported on combined venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella support (ECPella)
DESIGN
Retrospective observational study
SETTING
Single tertiary academic medical center
PARTICIPANTS
Patients age >18 years who were supported by ECPella between July 2021 and April 2024 INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
The study population comprised 98 patients, including 29 patients treated with heparin, 35 patients treated with bivalirudin, and 34 patients treated with a combination of heparin and bivalirudin. Thirteen patients had aortic thrombus and 23 patients had deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with no difference between anticoagulation strategies. Multivariate regression suggested that age and sex were factors in the increased risk for thrombus. Twenty-five of the 29 patients treated with heparin alone died, compared to 15 of the 35 patients treated with bivalirudin. There were no significant differences in intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) (13.89 days vs 24.77 days vs 26.65 days) across the 3 anticoagulation groups. Patients with either aortic thrombosis or DVT had a longer hospital LOS compared to those without either disorder (45.09 days vs 28.12 days; p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS
The frequency of aortic thrombus in patients supported on ECPella is high despite therapeutic anticoagulation. Routine screening with imaging is encouraged, and embolectomy should be considered at the time of decannulation to reduce postoperative complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.