A comparison of pediatric forearm fracture reduction between conscious sedation and general anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of children whose fractures were manipulated with nitrous oxide with those fractures manipulated under a general anesthetic.

DESIGN

We undertook a retrospective analysis of all children who presented to the emergency department with an angulated or displaced nonphyseal forearm fracture requiring manipulation over a 6-month period.

PATIENTS/

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-eight forearm fractures were manipulated using conscious sedation, whereas 27 were manipulated in the operating theatre under general anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The quality of reduction, the Cast Index, Padding Index, and Canterbury Index were similar between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the need for remanipulation in the nitrous oxide group (9) compared with the need for remanipulation in the theatre group (3).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher failure, manipulation of fractures in the emergency department using conscious sedation can achieve an adequate reduction and a high quality of cast. Failures were due to inherently more unstable fracture personalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.