Correlation between cognitive deficits and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity in first-episode depression.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Although depression is commonly accompanied by cognitive deficits, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. One possibility is that such deficits are related to abnormal brain network connections. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate changes in brain functional connectivity (FC) in depression and its relationship with cognitive deficits.
METHODS
We enrolled 37 first-episode MDD patients and 53 matched healthy controls (HC). All participants completed clinical and neurocognitive assessments and underwent resting-state functional MRI. Seed-based analysis was used to define the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and FC analysis was then performed. We used bias correlation to analyze the correlation between FC and clinical and neurocognitive scores.
RESULTS
MDD patients showed increased FC of the right DLPFC with the left inferior temporal gyrus, left cuneus, right inferior frontal gyrus, right anterior cingulate cortex, left BA39, right angular gyrus, right precuneus, left middle frontal gyrus, and right precentral gyrus. MDD patients also showed stronger FC in the left thalamus and reduced FC between the left superior occipital gyrus and left DLPFC seed region. Interestingly, increased FC was related to disease severity (with the right precentral gyrus) and social cognitive dysfunction (with the right angular gyrus) in MDD patients.
LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small and it is unclear how age may influence FC changes in patients with depression.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings support changes in FC of the DLPFC in early MDD patients related to cognitive function. FC is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of MDD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.