DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)69067-0
Long-term followup of cadaveric renal transplantation in patients with spina bifida.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Access related problems in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are increased in cases of spina bifida due to vascular and body habitus limitations. Reports of renal transplantation in this patient group are exceedingly rare. We report long-term followup data on cadaveric renal transplantation for end stage renal failure in cases of spina bifida.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Between February 1986 and April 2000, 17 cadaveric renal transplants were performed in 11 females and 5 males with spina bifida. Mean age at transplantation was 20.2 years (range 10 to 35). Of the patients 11 were wheelchair bound and 5 were independently mobile. Before transplantation surgical management of the urological tract included clean intermittent self-catheterization in 3 cases, enterocystoplasty and clean intermittent self-catheterization in 8, and ileal conduit urinary diversion in 5. A total of 14 patients were on renal replacement therapy before receiving the graft. Cyclosporine based triple therapy was administered to maintain immunosuppression in all cases and antithymocytic globulin was given for induction in 7.
RESULTS
Six grafts have failed, including 1 in a patient who underwent successful re-transplantation. Median graft survival was 7.23 years. Two patients died after graft nephrectomy. At a mean followup of 52.8 months (range 1 month to 14 years) 11 of 17 grafts are functioning with a mean serum creatinine of 112.7 +/- 29.4 mmol./l.
CONCLUSIONS
These data demonstrate the feasibility of cadaveric renal transplantation in patients with spina bifida and end stage renal failure. We currently recommend that these patients should not be deprived of the benefits of renal transplantation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.