MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.17116/jnevro20161167125-28

Медицинская библиотека · Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova · 2016

[Possibilities of treatment optimization in children and adolescents with epilepsy and disturbances of emotion and volition (disphoria)].

Popov Yu V, Yakovleva Yu A, Semenova S V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To optimize the treatment of dysphoriain children and adolescents in regard to sex and disease severity.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Seventy children and adolescents (boys - 45, girls - 25), aged from 6 to 18 years, with different forms of epilepsy and emotion and dysphoric disturbances were studied using CPRS andGCIscales Depending on dysphoria severity, patients were stratified into three groups: mild (n=19 (27.1%), moderate (n=27 (38.6%)) and severe (n=24 (34.3%)).

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSION

Dysphoric disorders were significantly more prevalent in boys, hostility and aggression were characteristic of boys as well. These facts impactedtreatment options. Neuroleptics were more frequently used in boys (35.5%) compared to girls(16%).Mild dysphoria didn't require additional treatment besides AED in 78,4%. In 75% cases of moderate dysphoria,systemic treatment with neuroleptics for 6 months was necessary. One-time recommendations for neuroleptic treatment were made in all three groups with the prevalence in a groupof children with severe and moderate dysphoria.

Для цитирования: Popov Yu V, Yakovleva Yu A, Semenova S V. [Possibilities of treatment optimization in children and adolescents with epilepsy and disturbances of emotion and volition (disphoria)].. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2016. DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20161167125-28.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.