MedElevator
Войти в исследования Irish journal of medical science · 2003
Cryptorchidism: a general surgical perspective.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lim K T, Casey R G, Lennon F, Gillen P, Stokes M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The treatment of cryptorchidism has changed, with surgery now advocated before the age of two years. Delayed treatment affects fertility, malignant potential and psychological stress.
AIMS: To assess the pattern of referral of cryptorchid patients to a surgical clinic, management and follow-up.
METHODS: A four-year review of 114 cryptorchid patients examined age at presentation, waiting time, timing of surgery and length of follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean age at presentation to the surgical clinic was 6.7 years (neonatal to 71). The mean age at orchidopexy was 5.6 years. Seventy per cent had a surgical procedure within eight weeks of presentation to a surgeon. Seven per cent were kept under surveillance until a maximum age of three years before orchidopexy was considered. Only 29% proceeded to surgery before the age of two. Seventeen were referred to a paediatric urology unit for further management.
CONCLUSIONS: Orchidopexy seems prudent between one and two years of age. Only one-quarter of patients underwent early orchidopexy. It is vital that it is detected early, by paediatricians at birth or the general practitioners (GPs) at the six-week check up. Prompt referral to a surgeon with a paediatric interest is essential in order to permit surveillance or surgery.
AIMS: To assess the pattern of referral of cryptorchid patients to a surgical clinic, management and follow-up.
METHODS: A four-year review of 114 cryptorchid patients examined age at presentation, waiting time, timing of surgery and length of follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean age at presentation to the surgical clinic was 6.7 years (neonatal to 71). The mean age at orchidopexy was 5.6 years. Seventy per cent had a surgical procedure within eight weeks of presentation to a surgeon. Seven per cent were kept under surveillance until a maximum age of three years before orchidopexy was considered. Only 29% proceeded to surgery before the age of two. Seventeen were referred to a paediatric urology unit for further management.
CONCLUSIONS: Orchidopexy seems prudent between one and two years of age. Only one-quarter of patients underwent early orchidopexy. It is vital that it is detected early, by paediatricians at birth or the general practitioners (GPs) at the six-week check up. Prompt referral to a surgeon with a paediatric interest is essential in order to permit surveillance or surgery.