MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/pan.14414

Медицинская библиотека · Paediatric anaesthesia · 2022

Pediatric spinal anesthesia at a tertiary care hospital: Eleven years after.

Eizaga Rebollar Ramón, García Palacios María Victoria, Morales Guerrero Javier, Torres Morera Luis Miguel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pediatric spinal anesthesia is an old technique whose use is not widespread, in spite of reducing the risk of cardiorespiratory events (hypoxemia, bradycardia, and hypotension) associated with general anesthesia, especially in neonates and infants. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the pediatric spinal anesthesia program at our tertiary care hospital over 11 years.

METHODS

Two hundred children, between 8 days and 13 years of age, who underwent lower body surgery under spinal anesthesia from May 2010 to July 2021 were included. Demographic and procedural data were collected, and success, failure, and complication rates calculated.

RESULTS

The success rate was 97.5% (n = 195). The incidence of complications was 2% (n = 4). They were 2 cases of intraoperative hypoxemia and 2 cases of postoperative postdural puncture headache , and they quickly resolved with no sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric spinal anesthesia is a safe and effective technique with good acceptance among anesthesiologists. Thus, the implementation of a pediatric spinal anesthesia program at a tertiary care hospital is feasible and affordable.

Для цитирования: Eizaga Rebollar Ramón, García Palacios María Victoria, Morales Guerrero Javier, Torres Morera Luis Miguel. Pediatric spinal anesthesia at a tertiary care hospital: Eleven years after.. Paediatric anaesthesia. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/pan.14414.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.