MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Ugeskrift for laeger · 1991

[3-year experiences with surgical treatment of epilepsy at the Hvidovre hospital].

Rogvi-Hansen B, Alving J, Andersen A R, Dam M, Friberg L, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Gram L, Herning M G, Høgenhaven H, Højgaard K

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The results of a retrospective survey of 48 patients submitted to neurosurgery for medically intractable epilepsy are presented. Twenty-eight patients were treated with selective amygdalohippocampectomy, one with temporal lobe resection, 12 with anterior callosotomy and seven with a total callosotomy. Of the amygdalohippocampectomized patients and the one with temporal lobe resection (n = 29), 52% were seizure free, 17% experienced rare seizures, 7% had a worthwhile improvement while 24% observed no worthwhile improvement (follow-up time 6 to 36 months). Of the callosotomized patients, 11% were free from generalized seizures, 69% had a significant seizure reduction and 18% experienced no worthwhile improvement. The observed neurological complications were: one patient had hemianopia, one had superior quadrant anopia, four developed unilateral anosmia and one complete anosmia. The callosotomized patients, with two exceptions, were all mentally and physically handicapped. In the callosotomy group, two patients died, one from a intracerebral hematoma three months after the operation and another patient seven months postoperatively from unknown causes.

Для цитирования: Rogvi-Hansen B, Alving J, Andersen A R, Dam M, Friberg L, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Gram L, Herning M G, Høgenhaven H, Højgaard K. [3-year experiences with surgical treatment of epilepsy at the Hvidovre hospital].. Ugeskrift for laeger. 1991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.