Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2015
Classification of mandible defects and algorithm for microvascular reconstruction.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schultz Benjamin D, Sosin Michael, Nam Arthur, Mohan Raja, Zhang Peter, Khalifian Saami, Vranis Neil, Manson Paul N, Bojovic Branko, Rodriguez Eduardo D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Composite mandibular tissue loss results in significant functional impairment and cosmetic deformity. This study classifies patterns of mandibular composite tissue loss and describes a microvascular treatment algorithm.
METHODS: A retrospective review of microvascular composite mandibular reconstruction from July of 2005 to April of 2013 by the senior surgeon at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and at The Johns Hopkins Hospital yielded 24 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.9 months. Causes of composite mandibular defects included tumors, osteoradionecrosis, trauma, infection, and congenital deformity. Patients with composite tissue loss were classified according to missing subunits.
RESULTS: A treatment algorithm based on composite mandibular defects and microvascular reconstruction was developed and used to treat 24 patients. A type 1 defect is a unilateral dentoalveolar defect not crossing the midline and not extending into the angle of the mandible. A type 2 defect is a unilateral defect extending beyond the angle. A type 3 defect is a bilateral defect not involving the angles. A type 4 defect is a bilateral defect with extension into at least one angle. Type 2 defects were the predominant group. Patients had microvascular reconstruction using either fibula flaps (n = 19) or iliac crest flaps (n = 5). Complications included infection, partial necrosis, plate fracture, dehiscence, and microvascular thrombosis.
CONCLUSION: This novel classification system and treatment algorithm allows for a consistent and reliable method of addressing composite mandibular defects and focuses on recipient vasculature and donor free flap characteristics.
METHODS: A retrospective review of microvascular composite mandibular reconstruction from July of 2005 to April of 2013 by the senior surgeon at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and at The Johns Hopkins Hospital yielded 24 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.9 months. Causes of composite mandibular defects included tumors, osteoradionecrosis, trauma, infection, and congenital deformity. Patients with composite tissue loss were classified according to missing subunits.
RESULTS: A treatment algorithm based on composite mandibular defects and microvascular reconstruction was developed and used to treat 24 patients. A type 1 defect is a unilateral dentoalveolar defect not crossing the midline and not extending into the angle of the mandible. A type 2 defect is a unilateral defect extending beyond the angle. A type 3 defect is a bilateral defect not involving the angles. A type 4 defect is a bilateral defect with extension into at least one angle. Type 2 defects were the predominant group. Patients had microvascular reconstruction using either fibula flaps (n = 19) or iliac crest flaps (n = 5). Complications included infection, partial necrosis, plate fracture, dehiscence, and microvascular thrombosis.
CONCLUSION: This novel classification system and treatment algorithm allows for a consistent and reliable method of addressing composite mandibular defects and focuses on recipient vasculature and donor free flap characteristics.