MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/01443610410001722626

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2004

Variation in practice of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation: a European survey.

Latthe P M, Powell Rebecca J, Daniels Jane, Hills R K, Gray R, Gupta J K, Khan K S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To examine the variation in current indications and surgical techniques for performing laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in Europe, all consultants on the databases of the UK Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1569) and the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (301) were surveyed. The questionnaire was returned by 719 (38% of 1870) of the gynaecologists contacted and 173 (24%) performed LUNA. Indications for LUNA, which included chronic pelvic pain (68%), dysmenorrhoea (66%), dyspareunia (39%) and endometriosis (60%), were similar across the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe. The European group were more likely to perform LUNA (62% versus 21%), completely transect the uterosacral ligaments (56% versus 36%) and at a distance of more than 2 cm from its cervical insertion (50% versus 21%) than the UK group. There is variation in the surgical techniques of performing LUNA in Europe and the techniques vary according to operator experience.

Для цитирования: Latthe P M, Powell Rebecca J, Daniels Jane, Hills R K, Gray R, Gupta J K, Khan K S. Variation in practice of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation: a European survey.. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004. DOI: 10.1080/01443610410001722626.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.