Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2013
Guided bone regeneration using chitosan-collagen membranes in dog dehiscence-type defect model.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xiaojing, Wang Xinmu, Zhao Tengfei, Gao Bo, Miao Yuwen, Zhang Dandan, Dong Yan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare a newly developed chitosan-collagen membrane (CCM) with a standard collagen membrane (SCM) regarding their effects on guided bone regeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The right mandibular premolars and first molar were extracted from 12 beagle dogs. Four months later, acute buccal dehiscence-type defects (4 × 3 mm in height and width) were surgically created after implant site preparation. The defects were randomly assigned to 4 different groups: CCM-1 (weight ratio of chitosan to collagen of 40:1), CCM-2 (weight ratio of chitosan to collagen of 20:1), SCM, and vehicle control. The dogs were sacrificed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing for radiographic examination, histologic observation, and histometric analysis.
RESULTS: The membrane-treated sites showed more bone formation than the control sites, although no statistically significant differences were found between the membrane-treated sites and the control sites for new bone-to-implant contact and new bone-filled area at any point. At 8 weeks, the new bone height for the membrane-treated sites was significantly greater statistically than that of the untreated group (P < .05). At 12 weeks, the CCM-1 group showed significantly greater new bone height (1.91 ± 0.25 mm) than the untreated group (1.20 ± 0.34 mm; P < .05). However, the CCMs did not show any statistically significant differences compared with the SCMs for any assessed parameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have shown that the developed CCMs can enhance bone regeneration and could be a candidate for use in guided bone regeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The right mandibular premolars and first molar were extracted from 12 beagle dogs. Four months later, acute buccal dehiscence-type defects (4 × 3 mm in height and width) were surgically created after implant site preparation. The defects were randomly assigned to 4 different groups: CCM-1 (weight ratio of chitosan to collagen of 40:1), CCM-2 (weight ratio of chitosan to collagen of 20:1), SCM, and vehicle control. The dogs were sacrificed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing for radiographic examination, histologic observation, and histometric analysis.
RESULTS: The membrane-treated sites showed more bone formation than the control sites, although no statistically significant differences were found between the membrane-treated sites and the control sites for new bone-to-implant contact and new bone-filled area at any point. At 8 weeks, the new bone height for the membrane-treated sites was significantly greater statistically than that of the untreated group (P < .05). At 12 weeks, the CCM-1 group showed significantly greater new bone height (1.91 ± 0.25 mm) than the untreated group (1.20 ± 0.34 mm; P < .05). However, the CCMs did not show any statistically significant differences compared with the SCMs for any assessed parameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have shown that the developed CCMs can enhance bone regeneration and could be a candidate for use in guided bone regeneration.