[Mild traumatic brain injury in children: can we predict intracranial complications?].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether clinical signs and symptoms can predict intracranial bleeding (ICB) in children with mild traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN
Retrospective chart review.
METHOD: We analysed clinical records from all children (0-18 years) who presented at the Emergency Department or were admitted to the paediatric ward of Isala, a regional trauma centre in Zwolle, the Netherlands, with mild traumatic brain injury between 2011 and 2013. We investigated the predictive value of vomiting, drowsiness, headache, periorbital haematoma, change in behaviour, seizures, amnesia, loss of consciousness and mild neurological symptoms for the presence of ICB by calculating sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio and likelihood ratio.
RESULTS
We analysed data from 410 patients (248 boys; mean [SD] age 4.5 [5.1] years). Most (n = 381, 93%) had normal consciousness on presentation. A CT scan was performed on admission in 84 patients (20.5%); 282 children (68.8%) were admitted for clinical observation (with or without head CT scan) and 51 children (12.4%) were discharged home immediately without imaging or observation. We found ICB in 10 patients (2.4%), only one of whom required neurosurgical intervention. None of the investigated clinical signs and symptoms showed a statistically significant association with bleeding or skull fractures on head CT scan.
CONCLUSION
In this study, no clinical sign or symptom could predict the risk of ICB in children with mild traumatic brain injury. Taking the low likelihood of ICB and the radiation damage associated with CT scanning into account, we conclude that a wait-and-see approach without initial imaging is justified and safe in children with mild traumatic brain injury without serious neurological symptoms.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.