The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2019
Hospital Volume Improves Primary, Revision, and Delayed Cleft Palate Repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Robin T, Shultz Blake N, Peck Connor J, Smetona John T, Steinbacher Derek M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High volume centers (HVC) is commonly associated with increased resources and improved patient outcomes. This study assesses efficacy and outcomes of high volume centers in cleft palate repair.
METHODS: Cleft palate procedures were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database from 2003-2009. Demographics, perioperative factors, co-morbidities, and complications in HVC (90th percentile, >48 cases/year) and non-high volume centers (NHVC) were compared across various cohorts of cleft repair.
RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred sixty-three (61.7%) total cleft palate surgeries were performed in HVC and 3388 (38.3%) were performed in NHVC. The NHVC treated a higher percentage of Medicaid patients (P = 0.005) and patients from low-income quartiles (P = 0.018). HVC had larger bedsizes (P <0.001), were more often government/private owned (P <0.001), and were more often teaching hospitals (P <0.001) located predominantly in urban settings (P <0.001). The HVC treated patients at younger ages (P = 0.008) and performed more concurrent procedures (P = 0.047). The most common diagnosis at HVC was complete cleft palate with incomplete cleft lip, while the most common diagnosis at NHVC was incomplete cleft palate without lip. Overall, length of stay and specific complication rates were lower in HVC (P = 0.048, P = 0.042). Primaries at HVCs showed lower pneumonia (P = 0.009) and specific complication rates (P = 0.023). Revisions at HVC were associated with older patients, fewer cardiac complications (P = 0.040), less wound disruption (P = 0.050), but more hemorrhage (P = 0.040).
METHODS: Cleft palate procedures were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database from 2003-2009. Demographics, perioperative factors, co-morbidities, and complications in HVC (90th percentile, >48 cases/year) and non-high volume centers (NHVC) were compared across various cohorts of cleft repair.
RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred sixty-three (61.7%) total cleft palate surgeries were performed in HVC and 3388 (38.3%) were performed in NHVC. The NHVC treated a higher percentage of Medicaid patients (P = 0.005) and patients from low-income quartiles (P = 0.018). HVC had larger bedsizes (P <0.001), were more often government/private owned (P <0.001), and were more often teaching hospitals (P <0.001) located predominantly in urban settings (P <0.001). The HVC treated patients at younger ages (P = 0.008) and performed more concurrent procedures (P = 0.047). The most common diagnosis at HVC was complete cleft palate with incomplete cleft lip, while the most common diagnosis at NHVC was incomplete cleft palate without lip. Overall, length of stay and specific complication rates were lower in HVC (P = 0.048, P = 0.042). Primaries at HVCs showed lower pneumonia (P = 0.009) and specific complication rates (P = 0.023). Revisions at HVC were associated with older patients, fewer cardiac complications (P = 0.040), less wound disruption (P = 0.050), but more hemorrhage (P = 0.040).