MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/htr.0000000000000848

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation · 2022

Discriminating Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Latent Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Profiles in Active-Duty Military Service Members.

de Souza Nicola L, Esopenko Carrie, Jia Yuane, Parrott J Scott, Merkley Tricia L, Dennis Emily L, Hillary Frank G, Velez Carmen, Cooper Douglas B, Kennedy Jan E, Lewis Jeffrey D, York Gerald E, Menefee Deleene S, McCauley Stephen R, Bowles Amy O, Wilde Elisabeth A, Tate David F

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly occur among military Service Members and Veterans and have heterogenous, but also overlapping symptom presentations, which often complicate the diagnoses of underlying impairments and development of effective treatment plans. Thus, we sought to examine whether the combination of whole brain gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) structural measures with neuropsychological performance can aid in the classification of military personnel with mTBI and PTSD.

METHODS

Active-Duty US Service Members ( n = 156; 87.8% male) with a history of mTBI, PTSD, combined mTBI+PTSD, or orthopedic injury completed a neuropsychological battery and T1- and diffusion-weighted structural neuroimaging. Cortical, subcortical, ventricular, and WM volumes and whole brain fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) were calculated. Latent profile analyses were performed to determine how the GM and WM indicators, together with neuropsychological indicators, classified individuals.

RESULTS

For both GM and WM, respectively, a 4-profile model was the best fit. The GM model identified greater ventricular volumes in Service Members with cognitive symptoms, including those with a diagnosis of mTBI, either alone or with PTSD. The WM model identified reduced FA and elevated RD in those with psychological symptoms, including those with PTSD or mTBI and comorbid PTSD. However, contrary to expectation, a global neural signature unique to those with comorbid mTBI and PTSD was not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that neuropsychological performance alone is more robust in differentiating Active-Duty Service Members with mTBI and PTSD, whereas global neuroimaging measures do not reliably differentiate between these groups.

Для цитирования: de Souza Nicola L, Esopenko Carrie, Jia Yuane, Parrott J Scott, Merkley Tricia L, Dennis Emily L, Hillary Frank G, Velez Carmen, Cooper Douglas B, Kennedy Jan E, Lewis Jeffrey D, York Gerald E, Menefee Deleene S, McCauley Stephen R, Bowles Amy O, Wilde Elisabeth A, Tate David F. Discriminating Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Latent Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Profiles in Active-Duty Military Service Members.. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000848.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.