DOI 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63038-4
Skin prick reaction and nasal provocation response in diagnosis of nasal allergy to the house dust mite.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The allergen skin test is commonly used to ensure the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis even though positive results do not necessarily indicate that rhinitis is of allergic origin.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the association between skin prick reactions and nasal provocation responses to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) allergen extract.
METHODS
Twenty-six patients with perennial rhinitis and 25 controls underwent skin prick and nasal provocation tests to standardized Der p allergen extract. With the use of allergen extract titration delivered by a metered dose pump, nasal stuffiness, itching, and sneezing were noted, the amount of secretions measured, and nasal airway resistance was recorded by active anterior rhinomanometry.
RESULTS
The majority of the patients with rhinitis (20/26), but none of the controls, exhibited strong skin test positivity (4+) to Der p allergen extract. In addition, the majority of the patients with 4+ skin reactions (16/20) had moderate to severe rhinitis. Significantly increased nasal reactivity to the allergen was also observed among those with 4+ skin test positivity. The controls exhibited nasal provocation responses only with significantly higher end-point doses of the allergen extract regardless of the skin test results.
CONCLUSION
Only 4+ skin test positivity was closely associated with increased nasal reactivity to Der p allergen among the patients with perennial rhinitis. The nasal provocation technique would be a useful adjunct testing to ensure the diagnosis of nasal allergy to the Der p mite, particularly among those patients with rhinitis with only mild to moderate skin test positivity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.