MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12098-013-1183-8

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of pediatrics · 2013

Surgical placement of totally implantable venous access device-an institutional experience.

Chandrasekaran Aravindan, Somasundaram Jayabose

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) catheter in pediatric age group and also to review this subject in the recent literature and compare the results with the present results.

METHODS

A total of 61 cases, 2 mo to 14 y old, were included in the index study. TIVADs were implanted in these patients for chemotherapy. The device was inserted under general anesthesia (GA) by open technique. All the children were followed up for a mean period of 7.2 mo.

RESULTS

Out of 61 cases, 9 cases had complications; 3 requiring removal of the port due to infection and in one case the device had to be reinserted due to malpositioning, one had late wound dehiscence with exposed port chamber which needed operative correction and four had minor wound infections. There was no mortality. Complications like hemo or pneumothorax, arterial puncture, hematoma formation were very less with open technique of insertion of the port. Most patients and their parents were satisfied with TIVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, TIVAD can be a useful device for many chronic patients who need an IV access for multiple injections especially in pediatric age group.

Для цитирования: Chandrasekaran Aravindan, Somasundaram Jayabose. Surgical placement of totally implantable venous access device-an institutional experience.. Indian journal of pediatrics. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-013-1183-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.