MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1055665619846763

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2019

Measuring Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Reliability and Validity of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the VELO Instrument.

Denadai Rafael, Raposo-Amaral Cassio Eduardo, Sabbag Anelise, Ribeiro Rafael Andrade, Buzzo Celso Luiz, Raposo-Amaral Cesar Augusto, Hung Man, Skirko Jonathan R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To test the Brazilian Portuguese velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) Effects on Life Outcome (VELO) instrument for reliability and validity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional methodological study.

SETTING

Tertiary craniofacial medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants with VPI (VPI group, n = 60), with cleft and without VPI (no VPI/cleft group, n = 60), and with no cleft nor VPI (no VPI/no cleft group, n = 60) and their parents (n = 180).

INTERVENTIONS: All patients with VPI 8+ years old and their parents completed the Brazilian-Portuguese VELO instrument and other questionnaires (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory4.0, PedsQL4.0; Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life, PVRQOL; and Intelligibility in Context Scale, ICS) at baseline; patients with VPI and their parents completed the VELO instrument again 2 weeks later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The VELO instrument was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity (participants with VPI against participants with no VPI), concurrent validity against other questionnaires, criterion validity against hypernasality severity, and construct validity against nasal air emission and overall velopharyngeal competence (speech construct) and velopharyngeal gap (anatomic construct).

RESULTS

The VELO had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α 0.99 for parents and 0.98 for participants with VPI) and test-retest reliability (all intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.87). The VELO discriminated well between VPI group and unaffected groups (all P < .05). The VELO was significantly correlated with the PedsQL4.0, PVRQOL, and ICS (-r > 0.75; P < .001). The VELO met criterion validity, speech construct validity, and anatomic construct validity (r > 0.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian-Portuguese VELO instrument demonstrated reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (discriminant, concurrent, criterion, and construct).

Для цитирования: Denadai Rafael, Raposo-Amaral Cassio Eduardo, Sabbag Anelise, Ribeiro Rafael Andrade, Buzzo Celso Luiz, Raposo-Amaral Cesar Augusto, Hung Man, Skirko Jonathan R. Measuring Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Reliability and Validity of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the VELO Instrument.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1055665619846763.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.