MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12199-010-0203-9

Медицинская библиотека · Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2011

Cytotoxicity and solubility evaluation of two types of whiskers by cell magnetometry.

Kudo Yuichiro, Aizawa Yoshiharu

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We investigated two types of whiskers, an antimony-containing tin-oxide-coated aluminum borate whisker (CABW) and an aluminum borate whisker (ABW), which are asbestos substitutes, in order to evaluate the safety of these fibers.

METHODS

The cytotoxicity and solubility of CABW and ABW were evaluated by cell magnetometry, LDH assay and solubility test.

RESULTS

ABW was found to be cytotoxic by cell magnetometry and slightly less soluble than CABW. In addition, it was found that the solubility of both fibers was intermediate between that of chrysotile and rock wool, as compared to our previous test results. Regarding the LDH assay, no significant difference was found among the fibers tested. These findings suggested that CABW, the surface of which is coated with antimony-containing tin oxide, had lower cytotoxicity and slightly higher solubility than ABW.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was only a short-term cytotoxicity and solubility study. Therefore, further safety assessment should be carried out in long-term experiments to examine the half-life of these fibers and monitor the potential development of lung carcinoma or mesothelioma after intratracheal instillation of these fibers in rats.

Для цитирования: Kudo Yuichiro, Aizawa Yoshiharu. Cytotoxicity and solubility evaluation of two types of whiskers by cell magnetometry.. Environmental health and preventive medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-010-0203-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.