Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft · 2019
Bone and soft tissue palatal morphology and potential anchorage sides in cleft palate patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moscarino Samantha, Scholz Johannes, Bastian Asisa, Knaup Isabel, Wolf Michael
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate palatal vertical bone thickness and density in relation to soft tissue on the hard palate for better selection of adequate bone regions for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants (MIs) in cleft palate patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) were obtained from 60 patients (mean age range 9-12). The study population included patients with isolate right side cleft palate formation (n = 20; 6 females; 14 males), left side cleft palate formation (n = 20; 9 females; 11 males) and without cleft formation as control group (n = 20; 15 females; 5 males). Bone and soft tissue measurements were performed vertical at a 90° angle to the bone surface, on previously defined measurement points (n = 88) on the hard palate. Bone density was measured on ten vertical layers in caudo-cranial direction.
RESULTS: In non-cleft patient the highest bone thickness was in the anterior palate and decreased significantly in posterior direction. In patients with right and left cleft palate, the highest vertical bone level could be observed at the palatal premaxillary border opposite to the cleft side. Patients in the control group showed a significantly lower vertical soft tissue thickness than patients with palatal cleft formation. The evaluation of bone density showed no significant differences in all three groups.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the favorable region for orthodontic MI placement is in the similar anatomical region compared to non-cleft patients, but differs from one side in each group. In unilateral cleft palate patients, the highest bone level was found on the anterior palate side opposite to the cleft side, indicating the most effective region for MIs placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) were obtained from 60 patients (mean age range 9-12). The study population included patients with isolate right side cleft palate formation (n = 20; 6 females; 14 males), left side cleft palate formation (n = 20; 9 females; 11 males) and without cleft formation as control group (n = 20; 15 females; 5 males). Bone and soft tissue measurements were performed vertical at a 90° angle to the bone surface, on previously defined measurement points (n = 88) on the hard palate. Bone density was measured on ten vertical layers in caudo-cranial direction.
RESULTS: In non-cleft patient the highest bone thickness was in the anterior palate and decreased significantly in posterior direction. In patients with right and left cleft palate, the highest vertical bone level could be observed at the palatal premaxillary border opposite to the cleft side. Patients in the control group showed a significantly lower vertical soft tissue thickness than patients with palatal cleft formation. The evaluation of bone density showed no significant differences in all three groups.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the favorable region for orthodontic MI placement is in the similar anatomical region compared to non-cleft patients, but differs from one side in each group. In unilateral cleft palate patients, the highest bone level was found on the anterior palate side opposite to the cleft side, indicating the most effective region for MIs placement.