World neurosurgery · 2020
Should the Presence of Spondylodiscitis Alter the Surgical Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Ventral Cervical Epidural Abscesses? An Institutional Analysiss.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tonetti Daniel A, Eichar Bradley, Ares William J, Kanter Adam S, Hamilton David Kojo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural abscess is a rare pathology with an incidence that has tripled in the past 2 decades. Ventral cervical epidural abscesses (vCEA) of the cervical spine pose particular treatment challenges because of the anatomical location. The aim of this report is to identify trends in the surgical management of these patients and to determine whether concomitant spondylodiscitis warrants fusion at the index surgery.
METHODS: Patients presenting to a quaternary care institution from January 2009 to December 2018 with isolated vCEA were identified. Patients were excluded if they had dorsal or circumferential epidural abscesses. Clinical and radiographic data were collected. Patients with vCEA were stratified by the presence or absence of spondylodiscitis upon presentation. Clinical outcomes analyzed included neurological sequelae and the need for revision surgery.
RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 36 patients presented with symptomatic isolated vCEA and constituted the study cohort; 16 (44%) had concurrent spondylodiscitis. All 36 patients underwent surgical decompression; the initial surgical approach was anterior-only for 7 patients (19%), posterior-only for 27 patients (75%), and and a combined approach for 2 patients (6%). Four patients from the total cohort (11%) ultimately required a revision operation; all 4 were from the subset with concurrent spondylodiscitis (25% vs. 0%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: vCEA can be evacuated safely and effectively by a variety of strategies in patients with neurologic deficits. Concomitant spondylodiscitis with cervical epidural abscess may warrant instrumented fusion as part of the initial surgical strategy.
METHODS: Patients presenting to a quaternary care institution from January 2009 to December 2018 with isolated vCEA were identified. Patients were excluded if they had dorsal or circumferential epidural abscesses. Clinical and radiographic data were collected. Patients with vCEA were stratified by the presence or absence of spondylodiscitis upon presentation. Clinical outcomes analyzed included neurological sequelae and the need for revision surgery.
RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 36 patients presented with symptomatic isolated vCEA and constituted the study cohort; 16 (44%) had concurrent spondylodiscitis. All 36 patients underwent surgical decompression; the initial surgical approach was anterior-only for 7 patients (19%), posterior-only for 27 patients (75%), and and a combined approach for 2 patients (6%). Four patients from the total cohort (11%) ultimately required a revision operation; all 4 were from the subset with concurrent spondylodiscitis (25% vs. 0%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: vCEA can be evacuated safely and effectively by a variety of strategies in patients with neurologic deficits. Concomitant spondylodiscitis with cervical epidural abscess may warrant instrumented fusion as part of the initial surgical strategy.