Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation · 1997
[Malignant hyperthermia and appendicular sepsis. Can they be differentiated during surgical procedure?].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Strecker G, Adnet P, Forget A P, Krivosic-Horber R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the possibility to differentiate clinically intraoperative malignant hyperthermia (MH) and sepsis.
STUDY DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study of clinical cases.
PATIENTS: Sixteen patients operated on for acute appendicitis and developing clinical signs of MH confirmed or not by in vitro caffeine halothane contracture tests (IVCT).
METHOD: To isolate the patients' characteristics with regard to the diagnosis of sepsis and MH crisis. To compare both groups of clinical features with results of IVCT.
RESULTS: The diagnosis of MH sensitivity has been excluded in ten hyperthermic patients and confirmed in four others with IVCT. No correlation was existing between the importance of perioperative sepsis, MH features and IVTC results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the difficulty to differentiate clinically MH and sepsis during surgery. Considering the severe outcome of MH crisis, it is recommended to start the specific therapy even in case of appendicular sepsis.
STUDY DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study of clinical cases.
PATIENTS: Sixteen patients operated on for acute appendicitis and developing clinical signs of MH confirmed or not by in vitro caffeine halothane contracture tests (IVCT).
METHOD: To isolate the patients' characteristics with regard to the diagnosis of sepsis and MH crisis. To compare both groups of clinical features with results of IVCT.
RESULTS: The diagnosis of MH sensitivity has been excluded in ten hyperthermic patients and confirmed in four others with IVCT. No correlation was existing between the importance of perioperative sepsis, MH features and IVTC results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the difficulty to differentiate clinically MH and sepsis during surgery. Considering the severe outcome of MH crisis, it is recommended to start the specific therapy even in case of appendicular sepsis.