The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2014
Impedance probe testing prior to pediatric airway reconstruction.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hart Catherine K, de Alarcon Alessandro, Tabangin Meredith E, Hamilton Steven, Rutter Michael J, Pentiuk Scott P, Garza Jose M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if preoperative impedance testing changed management and if testing was associated with surgical outcome in patients undergoing airway reconstruction.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who had impedance testing prior to airway reconstruction at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to September 2011. Charts were reviewed for demographics, medical/surgical history, impedance testing, and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included. Forty-seven (82%) were premature. Forty-seven (82%) had a primary diagnosis of subglottic stenosis. Twenty-six (45%) had prior airway surgery. Thirty-six (63%) had gastroesophageal reflux and 21 (36%) had undergone fundoplication. Patients without fundoplication had a median 46 total reflux, 7 proximal, and 14.5 acidic events compared to a median 5 total reflux, 0 proximal, and 0 acidic events in patients with fundoplication. Impedance testing changed management in 22% (8/36) of nonfundoplication patients and 9.5% (2/21) of fundoplication patients. In unadjusted analysis, fewer fundoplication patients had successful surgery compared to those without (33% vs 67%, P = .01). Prematurity, age at surgery, and previous airway surgery were also important predictors of surgical success.
CONCLUSION: Fewer patients than anticipated had a change in management. Impedance testing was unlikely to change management in fundoplication patients. Patients with fundoplication were less likely to have a successful outcome, suggesting that factors other than reflux influence airway reconstruction outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who had impedance testing prior to airway reconstruction at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to September 2011. Charts were reviewed for demographics, medical/surgical history, impedance testing, and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included. Forty-seven (82%) were premature. Forty-seven (82%) had a primary diagnosis of subglottic stenosis. Twenty-six (45%) had prior airway surgery. Thirty-six (63%) had gastroesophageal reflux and 21 (36%) had undergone fundoplication. Patients without fundoplication had a median 46 total reflux, 7 proximal, and 14.5 acidic events compared to a median 5 total reflux, 0 proximal, and 0 acidic events in patients with fundoplication. Impedance testing changed management in 22% (8/36) of nonfundoplication patients and 9.5% (2/21) of fundoplication patients. In unadjusted analysis, fewer fundoplication patients had successful surgery compared to those without (33% vs 67%, P = .01). Prematurity, age at surgery, and previous airway surgery were also important predictors of surgical success.
CONCLUSION: Fewer patients than anticipated had a change in management. Impedance testing was unlikely to change management in fundoplication patients. Patients with fundoplication were less likely to have a successful outcome, suggesting that factors other than reflux influence airway reconstruction outcomes.