The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2012
PRKAR1A and PDE4D mutations cause acrodysostosis but two distinct syndromes with or without GPCR-signaling hormone resistance.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Linglart Agnès, Fryssira Helena, Hiort Olaf, Holterhus Paul-Martin, Perez de Nanclares Guiomar, Argente Jesús, Heinrichs Claudine, Kuechler Alma, Mantovani Giovanna, Leheup Bruno, Wicart Philippe, Chassot Virginie, Schmidt Dorothée, Rubio-Cabezas Óscar, Richter-Unruh Annette, Berrade Sara, Pereda Arrate, Boros Emese, Muñoz-Calvo Maria Teresa, Castori Marco, Gunes Yasemin, Bertrand Guylene, Bougnères Pierre, Clauser Eric, Silve Caroline
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Acrodysostosis is a rare skeletal dysplasia that is associated with multiple resistance to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling hormones in a subset of patients. Acrodysostosis is genetically heterogeneous because it results from heterozygous mutations in PRKAR1A or PDE4D, two key actors in the GPCR-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the phenotypic features that distinguish the two genotypes causing acrodysostosis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen unrelated patients with acrodysostosis underwent a candidate-gene approach and were investigated for phenotypic features.
RESULTS: All patients had heterozygous de novo mutations. Fourteen patients carried a PRKAR1A mutation (PRKAR1A patients), five each a novel PRKAR1A mutation (p.Q285R, p.G289E, p.A328V, p.R335L, or p.Q372X), nine the reported PRKAR1A p.R368X mutation; two patients harbored a mutation in PDE4D (PDE4D patients) (one novel mutation, p.A227S; one reported, p.E590A). All PRKAR1A, but none of the PDE4D mutated patients were resistant to PTH and TSH. Two PRKAR1A patients each with a novel mutation presented a specific pattern of brachydactyly. One PDE4D patient presented with acroskyphodysplasia. Additional phenotypic differences included mental retardation in PDE4D patients. In addition, we report the presence of pigmented skin lesions in PRKAR1A and PDE4D patients, a feature not yet described in the acrodysostosis entity.
CONCLUSIONS: All PRKAR1A and PDE4D patients present similar bone dysplasia characterizing acrodysostosis. Phenotypic differences, including the presence of resistance to GPCR-cAMP signaling hormones in PRKAR1A but not PDE4D patients, indicate phenotype-genotype correlations and highlight the specific contributions of PRKAR1A and PDE4D in cAMP signaling in different tissues.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the phenotypic features that distinguish the two genotypes causing acrodysostosis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen unrelated patients with acrodysostosis underwent a candidate-gene approach and were investigated for phenotypic features.
RESULTS: All patients had heterozygous de novo mutations. Fourteen patients carried a PRKAR1A mutation (PRKAR1A patients), five each a novel PRKAR1A mutation (p.Q285R, p.G289E, p.A328V, p.R335L, or p.Q372X), nine the reported PRKAR1A p.R368X mutation; two patients harbored a mutation in PDE4D (PDE4D patients) (one novel mutation, p.A227S; one reported, p.E590A). All PRKAR1A, but none of the PDE4D mutated patients were resistant to PTH and TSH. Two PRKAR1A patients each with a novel mutation presented a specific pattern of brachydactyly. One PDE4D patient presented with acroskyphodysplasia. Additional phenotypic differences included mental retardation in PDE4D patients. In addition, we report the presence of pigmented skin lesions in PRKAR1A and PDE4D patients, a feature not yet described in the acrodysostosis entity.
CONCLUSIONS: All PRKAR1A and PDE4D patients present similar bone dysplasia characterizing acrodysostosis. Phenotypic differences, including the presence of resistance to GPCR-cAMP signaling hormones in PRKAR1A but not PDE4D patients, indicate phenotype-genotype correlations and highlight the specific contributions of PRKAR1A and PDE4D in cAMP signaling in different tissues.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIalpha SubunitCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 3Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4Diagnostic Techniques, EndocrineDrug ResistanceDysostosesFemaleHormonesHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleOsteochondrodysplasiasParathyroid HormoneReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionSyndromeThyroid Hormone Resistance SyndromeYoung Adult